I am equally appalled that this ruling was handed down by 5 men, whose decision implies that discriminating against women is not discrimination as long as you do it for religious reasons. And oh yeah, their vasectomies are still covered, so no harm, no foul. The 3 women and 1 man in the dissenting minority filed a dissent outlining not only the violation of women's rights, but the danger that this ruling could be applied to other religious objections:
Justice Ginsburg’s Dissent
"Would the exemption the Court holds RFRA demands for employers with
religiously grounded objections to the use of certain contraceptives
extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood
transfusions (Jehovah’s Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists);
medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids,
and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and
vaccinations (Christian Scientists, among others)?"
| (Source) |
Nancy Pelosi, the house minority leader and my representative here in California called the ruling an “outrageous step against
the rights of America's women." Although only those employed by Hobby Lobby are most immediately effected, it's impossible to know the long lasting consequences. Since The Affordable Care Act in 2010 (ObamaCare) mandated that insurance companies provide a basic health care package including contraceptives, over 70 lawsuits were filed and there are still 48 pending in the courts right now. An estimated 90% of corporations in America are closely-held corporations and together they account for 52% of our workforce. What is to stop them all from filing religious exemption suits to deny their female employees coverage?
I am truly disgusted with our court system right now. How could they do this to women? As someone who already has little control over their reproductive health, it's staggering to me that the courts feel my employers have a right to interfere with my medical decisions. What about those people who chose contraceptive devices like IUDs for medical reasons? Why should their right to proper health care be superseded by their boss' view on contraceptives? The discrimination is staggering. According to courts and health care system right now, infertility is not a disease for which you should receive coverage and your boss can decide what kind of contraception your insurance should offer. Disgusting.
No comments:
Post a Comment